Saturday, 21 May 2011

HAWAL MASSACRE "21 MAY 1990" - My son was shot dead infront of me


“They started entering houses and shooting people at point blank range,” Ghulam Qadeer Baig recalls that fateful day of May 21, 1990, which is remembered as Hawal massacre in the collective memory of Kashmiris. The killings by the Border Security Force troopers took place on a day when people were participating in the funeral procession of Mirwaiz Molvi Farooq. Ghulam Qadeer’s brother-in-law, Farooq A hmad Baig, son of Mohammad Abdullah Baig, was among the 67 people killed in the Hawal massacre – one of the worst massacres in Kashmir’s recent history. “I still remember it like it was yesterday,” Qadeer recalls. “How could I forget it?
We were helpless and at the mercy of those who had come to kill us,” he says and then lapses into a melancholic silence. Clogged by memories that come back to haunt him, he needs these pauses to recollect his thoughts.
His wife, Parvaiza, chips in when her husband fails to express his pain. “My brother was one among the people killed that day,” she says. He was participating in the funeral procession of Mirwaiz Molvi Farooq. “He was just paying his respects to a dead man,” she says. “Why did they have to kill him?”
Recounting the events of that day, she says, “On hearing gun-shots, many people ran and hid themselves in a neighbour’s house. I was one among them. That is why I could not see my brother being killed.” Casting a longing glance at the picture of her brother, Parvaiza is torn between the consolation of not having to bear the sight of her brother being shot in front of her eyes, and the regret of not being able to see him alive for the last time. Although Ghulam Qadeer has survived that horrific day, he hasn’t been able to come out of it without scars. He says the BSF troopers entered his neighbour’s house and shot him and his son, and then their house was set on fire.
The troopers next barged into Basheer Ahmad Baig’s house. “They killed him and his two sons,” says Qadeer. “His wife was also shot in the chest, but she survived along with their third son.”
The names of the victims and the number of people killed that day may change, but there’s one common feature in all the memories of survivors: troopers barging into people’s homes and shooting civilians, and not even sparing women and children.

“My son, who was ten years old then, was also shot at by the BSF troopers,” says Qadeer. “But thanks to Allah, the bullets missed him and hit the wall behind him,” he says. “The troopers also came towards me. I was sitting in this very room, with my young daughter in my lap,” he recalls sitting in his room. One of the troopers placed the barrel of his gun on Qadeer’s chest. “But he eventually changed his mind and did not shoot me,” he says.
Parvaiza’s sobs are the only intermittent sounds in her room. The silence that fills the room is deafening. Abdul Farooq’s mother, Makhta Begum, 60, enters the room.
“They came and snatched him from my arms. The troopers followed Farooq Ahmad right from the procession to his house. When he came in, his mother heldhim close to her chest -- to protect him. “He was shot in front of me,” Makhta Begum recalls that day when her son was killed. She recounts that day in a matter of fact tone, as if she is bereft of all feelings and emotions. Later, the Beig family went to the Nowhatta police station and lodged a complaint against the troopers. “One of the BSF trooper’s cap fell in our home. The name inscribed on it was Pokhla. We took it to the police station and lodged a complaint against the trooper,” says Qadeer. But the trooper was suspended from duty only for six months.
Pokhla’s suspension could not bring them justice. If anything, it made their lives even worse. “We complained in the hope that he would be jailed and
justice would be done to us,” says Parvaiza. “But they only suspended him for some time,” she says. “He was living in the area around our house and we did not want to face the consequences of standing up against a trooper.”
The family eventually had to move out of the locality and shift to Pampore in Pulwama district. They were on the move for about ten years, constantly shift
ing to Zoonimar and Soura. It cost Ghulam Qadeer his livelihood. “We lost our business and are living like paupers now,” says Ghulam Qadeer whose back problem restricts him from taking up regular jobs.

Eventually, they had to return to their own home in Hawal, where the ghosts of May 21, 1990 still haunt the family....

Friday, 20 May 2011

Srinagar On 21th MAY

Authorities have imposed restrictions on civilian movement in Srinagar’s old parts to stall the Mirwaiz-led Hurriyat rally at Eid Gah today. The rally was part of Hurriyat’s week-long programme on the death anniversaries of Mirwaiz Molvi Mohammad Farooq and Khwaja Abdul Gani Lone

This is for the first time that the authorities decided against allowing the Hurriyat amalgam to take out a rally on the occasion. The decision not to allow the rally at Eidgah was taken at a high level meeting of police, intelligence and civil administration officials late on Friday evening.

Sources said that th decision came after Mirwaiz announced that Hurriyat Conference would lay a foundation for a Martyrs Memorial at the Eidgah graveyard. Some senior civil administration and police officials visited Mirwaiz’s residence on Friday night and asked him not to go ahead with the construction of the memorial. But after refusal from the Mirwaiz to fall in line, the authorities decided to impose ban on the rally.

Last year (2010), Syed Ali Geelan, chairman of the other faction of the Hurriyat, also announced to build a martyrs’ memorial wall at Eid Gah, which government foiled by imposing curfew restrictions in the city.

Eyewitness as also local residents, who could be reached over phone, said that strict curfew has been imposed in dozens of localities including Rajouri Kadal, Bohri Kadal, Saraf Kadal, Safa Kadal, Eid Gah, Nawa Kadal, Nowhatta, Hawal and other areas. They said that police and CRPF have been deployed in strength to curb the peoples’ movement.

Reports said that groups of angry youth defied restrictions at Nowhatta and pelted stones on police and CRPF. Clashes between angry youth and police were reported at Bohri Kadal and Rajouri Kadal as well.

The uptown areas of the city are paralysed under a shutdown. While all the shops and business house are closed, private transports however ply normally.

Police are reported to have arrested several youth in Srinagar during nocturnal raids on Friday. Senior JKLF leader Javaid Mir was arrested from his Zaiana Kadal house and lodged in Maharaj Ganj Police Station. Talking to Honour over phone he said that some half a dozen local youth had also been rounded up by police and lodged in police station.

Earlier police placed Syed Ali Geelani under house arrest on Thursday to thwart him from holding a public rally at Islamabad. Geelani has announced to hold public rallies at all district headquarters to press for the release of political prisoners. According to Geelani, around 1500 Kashmiri political leaders and youth are presently languishing in jails.

JKLF chairman Yasin Malik was also taken into custody on Friday to prevent him from addressing a public rally at Kangan.

India admits blunder and withdraws Pakistan 'Most Wanted' list

India on Friday withdrew a public list of most-wanted fugitives it wants Pakistan to extradite after discovering at least one of them was in a prison, the latest embarrassment for a government hit by corruption scandals and political slip-ups.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) said it had failed to update its records after one accused was arrested in 2010, meaning his name remained on a list handed over to Islamabad this March.
It is a setback for the government that has long accused Islamabad of aiding militant groups for attacks on India, including the 2008 Mumbai raids. The list was originally seen as adding pressure on Pakistan to act.
A second person on the list sent to Pakistan was earlier traced by local media to his home in western Maharashtra state. Another person on the website was extradited from Bangladesh to India in October, media reported.
Officials including Home Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram, who initially laughed off reports of errors in the list, admitted responsibility.
"Error has been accepted. Responsibility will be fixed for the mistake," Internal Security Secretary U.K. Bansal told reporters.
The list included names of five Pakistani army men, the first time India has formally accused the powerful military of aiding militant attacks on India.
The embarrassment is a personal blow to Chidambaram, seen as one of the more efficient ministers in Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's team, and it sparked calls for his resignation from the Hindu nationalist main opposition Bharatiya Janata Party.
It is also a setback for a Congress-led coalition government that has been perceived to be out of touch with the people due to its lumbering response to a series of high-profile graft cases and soaring prices.
The Congress party too has painted itself into a corner this week. Rahul Gandhi, seen as a prime minister in waiting, claimed the opposition-ruled Uttar Pradesh killed and incinerated farmers protesting against a $2 billion highway plan through their lands.
The claims came under immediate criticism from both the state government and media, which cast doubt on his charges. Many commentators said the controversy was a setback for Gandhi's campaign to portray himself as a future leader of India.

Kashmir- The Untold And Unread History.


By: Fariq Ahmed

Under the dogra rule kashmir has faced numerous atrocities, 1924 was the first ever revolt at silk factory by kashmiri’s who were only kept under forced labour. In 1930 plinth of “Muslim young association” was formed under Gulam Abaas,who in 1936 made revolutionary step of making “All jammu and kashmir muslim conference” with Sheikh Abullah… So the platform for Muslim conference was laid under Gulam abaas with Sheik Abdullah (who later betrayed), Obviously,it created panic among the leading political parties like Indian National Congress who left no stone unturned to break this unity and at last outshoot of Muslim conference was mad under the name of National conference (with nationalism concept). Thought both these parties initially found for Kashmir cause. When in 1940 pakistan act was accepted, Muslims of J&K tried to affiliate with Pakistan. So this became the political motive of Muslim conference. This led to mass arrest of activists and even exiled from their land. Still in 1947 Muslim conference won 15 seats out of 21, while other 6 were rejected candidates.
It was during World War II that revolution increased day by day even under harsh dogra rule…?”Almighty Allah knows my intensions” Insha Allah m peace loving but i can’t lie about history… Present govt. in j&k is Kashmir govt (i mean Kashmir CM) still killings continue; That too i accept. But i had to start from base….
With the idea of making two independent nations after the end of British rule, it was decided at “chambers of princes” that a state having Muslim majority will go to Pakistan and states with Hindu majority will go to Hindustan. This was already accepted baseline, but it was also mentioned states who match in culture, language, geography should join with respective nation… It was 19th July 1947 when Muslim conference put forth their points to affiliate with Pakistan before the maharaja of Kashmir. In it was written Muslim conference has reached to conclusion that according to geographical reality, Proportion of Muslims (80%), link with main rivers of Punjab, culture, economy, language etc Kashmir should get affiliated with Pakistan But maharaja was playing diplomacy game… Maharaja on one hand was accepting points of Muslim conference but was having silent talks with Hindustan. This was most dangerous plan building for Muslims.
On 15th august 1947 “stand still agreement was made between maharaja and Pakistan which only give Pakistan a temporary position of affiliation. On the other hand maharaja was building links with many terrorist groups like RSS etc to eliminate the majority in Kashmir. September 1947 marked the start of mass genocide of Kashmir Muslims and whosoever was left alive was sent to Pakistan. Girls/women’s were kidnapped and youths were killed in mass. This was what was happening inside Kashmir, Britishers also give a pump to This war by making entry of Hindustan easy through gorda sopore.
Now Muslims realized about the dual nature of maharaja and started to revolt. In this regard poonch was the first area who revolted with weapons in October 1946.This fire slowly spread to entire valley. Maharaja tried to ward off this movement but he got nothing, even west Pakistan came to help and entered poonch. Maharaja tried to hide himself in Jammu. To make his place secure in Jammu, he gave orders of mass killings which counted for lakhs of lives at RS pura border area wich was Muslims majority area. It was turned to muslin minority and Sikhs from Punjab were forced to live there .. As mass killings continued in Jammu, still volunteers from Kashmir and west Pakistan came to rescue and as Maharaja was at brim to extinct. He requested Hindustan for a treaty. Defense commute accepted it in no time and Army landed in Jammu and Kashmir.
From that time till now they are residing In j&k. It should be borne in mind that the treaty was a temporary one only to fight against volunteers. So the fight was between armed, well equipped, trained Hindustan army and unarmed volunteers. Air force was also used and by may 1948 war reached to borders of Pakistan. Pakistan retaliated but was less advanced than Hindustan in terms of arms and ammunition.
This issue was brought under notice of Security council. Hindustan presented the issue in completly different format on 1 Jan 1948, wherein Pakistan complained on 15 Jan 1948. Now war reached from land to council. This was the time when Security council passed some important resolutions for J&K.
After a year of discussion at Security council it was on 13 august 1948 and 25 jan 1949 that cease fire resolution and resolution for being “Kashmir as disputed part” was given……

Thursday, 19 May 2011

Disputed territories: Call for true autonomy, equal rights for G-B, AJK


Speakers demand constitutional safeguards; redefining views on Kashmir.
ISLAMABAD: 
A paradigm shift in Pakistan’s decades old stance on Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit-Baltistan (G-B) is needed alongside genuine autonomy and equal rights at par with other provinces without altering UN resolutions on Kashmir.

This was the consensus of participants in a forum on “Proposed Constitutional Amendments in the Constitution of Pakistan for Empowerment of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan” organised by the Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency (PILDAT).
Participants also called for an end to bureaucratic rule and interference from Islamabad in the internal affairs of the two regions and ensuring genuine democracy in AJK and G-B. The participants, including political leaders, former presidents, prime ministers of AJK, former diplomats, retired military officers, journalists and legal experts, were near unanimous that Pakistani rulers are treating the two regions like colonies and are not honouring the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP) resolutions regarding Kashmir and G-B. They called for giving equal representation to the people of AJK and G-B in Pakistan’s parliament.
Justice (retd) Syed Manzoor Hussain Gillani, Former acting Chief Justice of the AJK Supreme Court, presented his discussion paper on the proposed Constructional Reforms. “AJK and G-B should provisionally be given at least the same quantum of autonomy (without changing their status) as given to the provinces of Pakistan,” he stated in his presentation.
Suggesting a few amendments in the Constitution of Pakistan, he stressed that these amendments would not affect the status of the disputed state, nor Pakistan’s position on the Kashmir dispute. “The state is disputed but rights are not disputed,” he said. While analysing the proposed amendments, Daily Pakistan Editor in Chief Mujibur Rehman Shami said, “If we recognise AJK and G-B as provinces then we should give them an equivalent number of seats in the Senate of Pakistan.”
Raja Farooq Haider Khan, Former AJK Prime Minister, said the powers given in article 31(3) should be given to the Pakistan Government and the rest should be given to the AJK government. Former IGP Afzal Shigri believed that rights should be given to those people who want to join Pakistan and struggled for it. Gen (retd) Muhammad Aziz Khan, a former CJCSC, was of the view that maximum autonomy should be given to AJK and G-B.
Asif Ezdi, an analyst, believed that there is a ‘constitutional limbo’ over AJK and G-B status. Mosharaf Zaidi suggested that strategic calculations should be kept in mind when ever we discuss any constitutional, administrative or legal change. Inamul Haq, former foreign minister, while commenting on the topic said that it is only in the ambit of the UN Security Council that Pakistan can stand internationally on Kashmir. Ghulam Abbas, Editor Daily K2, said that UN Security Council doesn’t deny fundamental rights of the people of AJK and G-B, therefore these constitutional amendments should be acted upon.
Amina Ansari, member G-B Legislative Assembly, said that people of G-B are part of Pakistan who voluntarily joined Pakistan. She objected to the legality of the G-B self governance order.
Haroon Khalid, a politician from G-B, commented that G-B is a strategically important part of Pakistan, therefore this region should be given its due importance. Dr Riffat Hussain, a political analyst, was of the view that any effort to empower people of AJK and GB would undermine India’s stance of denying rights to those areas.
Khalid Sultan, Director General Civil Services Academy and Former Chief Secretary AJK, said that the only way to protect the rights of AJK and G-B could only be done through amendments in the constitution.
Ahmed Bilal Mehboob, Executive Director PILDAT, said that the constitution status of AJK and G-B should be reviewed as it has been ignored in the mainstream political and constitutional structure of the country for almost half a century.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 19th, 2011.

Jammu & Kashmir Must Release Or Charge Teenage Protestor :AI Report


Murtaza Manzoor was rearrested by police on the day of his release from prison

The Jammu and Kashmir authorities must immediately release or charge a teenage anti-government protester who was rearrested this week after spending three months in administrative detention, Amnesty International said.
Murtaza Manzoor, 17, was briefly released from prison on Wednesday after the High Court found that his administrative detention was unlawful. He was immediately rearrested by police.
Amnesty International said it is likely that a repeat administrative detention order for Murtaza Manzoor will be passed, allowing police to detain him without charge or trial for up to two years.
"The police in Jammu and Kashmir are playing a game with the judiciary. Courts order a person's release only for the police to wait outside prison to re-arrest them. This farce should stop," said Sam Zarifi, Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific Director.
"Murtaza Manzoor must be released immediately, unless he is charged with a recognizable criminal offence. If so, he should be remanded in custody by an independent court and his rights as a child should be recognized. The authorities must not order his repeat administrative detention."
Although he is 17 years old Murtaza Manzoor is being treated as an adult because the laws of Jammu and Kashmir define boys above the age of 16 as adults. This contravenes both Indian law and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir has said that the laws will be amended to make them consistent with international law and standards.

"We can clearly see the need to amend the law in Jammu and Kashmir because teenage boys are held in jails with no special facilities for juveniles," said Sam Zarifi.

Police arrested Murtaza Manzoor on 21 January in the state capital Srinagar. He was accused of attempted murder, assault and rioting, based on allegations that he led a June 2010 protest against the Indian government that turned violent and resulted in protesters rioting and pelting police with stones.
On 8 February, fearing that Manzoor would be released on bail, police placed him in administrative detention under the highly problematic Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (PSA), which allows for up to two years’ detention without charge or trial.

On 13 May the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir found Murtaza Manzoor's detention to be unlawful and ordered his release.On 18 May, instead of being released to his father who was waiting outside the Kot Bhalwal Jail, Murtaza Manzoor was escorted from the prison by four policemen of a specialist counter-insurgency team and taken to the Joint Interrogation Centre at Jammu.

Police told his father that Murtaza Manzoor would be kept at the interrogation centre for a few days before being handed over to a police station in Srinagar. "Murtaza’s case illustrates the ‘revolving door’ nature of detentions widespread in PSA cases, as documented in Amnesty International’s recent report: A Lawless Law,” said Sam Zarifi. “ Murtaza Manzoor's family was not given any information on the alleged offences for which he is being held. Amnesty International said it believes his detention may be unlawful.

At least 322 people are reported to have been detained without trial under the provisions of the Public Safety Act in Jammu and Kashmir from January to September 2010 alone.A number of them, including children, have been detained on similar grounds of stone pelting and rioting during various protests against the Indian government throughout the summer of 2010.

READ MORE