Showing posts with label Mehboob Makhdoomi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mehboob Makhdoomi. Show all posts

Friday, 29 April 2011

"Resolution Of Kashmir" - Declared as the Best Resolution by International Center of Religion and Diplomacy , USA

By : Mehboob Makhdoomi
"I do not find any point in starting this essay with the history of Kashmir. In my essay, only few historical instances will be brought into the lime light, where ever required.

Resolution of any problem can be ascertained by the deep understanding of the cause of the problem.kashmir imbroglio, although being a vexed issue is not complicated to understand at all. History stands witness to each and every incident. I repeat, it’s crystal clear. Then the question arises, why is it still unresolved even after 60 years? There are many answers to it. India’s adamance, few mistakes by Pakistan, and last but not the least is the confused Kashmiri leadership.

It is not wise to call Kashmir just a bilateral issue. The fate of 13.6 million people can not be decided by the two foreign countries or any organization which does not represent Kashmir’s truly. Pakistan's representation of Kashmir is always being seen at, with dubious eyes at the international platform. No country can trust Pakistan’s sayings about the condition of Kashmir. Many countries and organizations perceive India and Pakistan both as occupants and do not differentiate them, saying both of these nations have their vested interests in it.So my point is that the bottleneck of the problem is weak and bifurcated Kashmiri separatist leadership, so are the people. This has given rise to the two obstacles in between Kashmir and its freedom.


1. LOSS OF THE FREEDOM PASSION; Kashmir’s have never felt to be part of India, they always aspired for their freedom, but they were predominantly ignorant, so they needed a reliable, wise and influential torch bearer. They got few but at the end of the day all of them turned out to be cheaters. so due to the known reasons, violence broke out in the valley. It was not the war between few organizations and India. It was a civil war. It was raised by the local populace of Kashmir, it was so popular that if India would not have been able to succeed in confusing the militant outfits and the people of Kashmir and if it would have persisted 1 or 2 years further with the same zeal and passion, India had to leave the valley. India’s first success was the internal rift in Kashmiri militants, a gang war like situation prevailed, when hizbul mujahideen and Jammu Kashmir liberation front began to kill each other due to their ideological differences, leaving the war against India aside. So with this, local population was divided as both these outfits had mass public support.
This broke the back of Kashmir freedom struggle.

The second setback to the struggle was a very ugly name in the history of Kashmir, i.e. KUKA PARRAY, the very unfortunate formation of so called ikhwaan. India succeeded in indoctrinating hundred's of kashmiri youth, majority of whom were former millitants,to surrender and gave them arms, ranks, unlimited power and utilized them to curb the militancy, because, they being locals and involved in militancy before, knew each and everything about the militants, their thinking and way of operating. Although majority of these so-called ikhwanis have been killed by the militants now, but the damage done by them to the freedom struggle is irreparable. This second setback cooled everything down and this betrayal even killed the freedom passion in the local populace. There was a lack of trust. Nobody would know who is who. Even there were many families which had its members in different rival organizations. On the whole, India played a very intelligent politics in curbing Kashmir’s struggle. India could not have been successful in doing all this directly without getting locals into it.

2. INADEQUATE INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT; According to united nations resolutions, Kashmir is a disputed territory whose people have to exercise their rights through a free and fair plebiscite under U.N. So this dispute was internationally recognized, but now Kashmir has lost that support to a great extent. There are again 2 reasons for it. a).immediately after the armed resistance erupted in the valley, there was a huge exodus of minority pandit community, a plan mainly engineered by the then governor general of Kashmir, Mr. Jagmohan, and many other unpopular reasons are responsible for it. This helped India to label the Kashmiri uprising purely Islamic; India was successful to frame this issue on communal lines, to a great extent. So this defamed the uprising in many parts of the world.

b). Another setback was the September 11, 2001 attack on twin towers and pentagon in the united states of America, after which America’s 'war against terror' was launched all over the world. So in this post-9/11 world, it became hard for international community to differentiate between freedom struggle and terrorism. The word 'terrorism' became so popular that anybody with a weapon, for any cause, was labeled as terrorist. According to America, their prime suspect was Sheikh Osama bin laden, for whom they attacked Afghanistan and then suspected him to be in South Waziristan, which is a Pak-Afghan border area. America found Pakistan to have huge no. of Osama sympathizers, and Pakistan somehow managed to convince America and saved itself from devastation, although it was at the brink of it. So, now it was a cake walk for India to link Kashmir issue with the international terrorism. According to India, 9/11 attack had a direct link with Kashmir and it even succeeded in highlighting this link to a great extent.So these two reasons, especially the second one destructed the Kashmir’s international support as India claimed to be the terror victim like USA.
So, till now I have sorted out the basic two problems, which if dealt with delicately, and solved, the day is not far when we can see a free Kashmir.

Now the remedies to solve the problems;


50% of the problem is solved if its cause is predicted and then understood properly so at the present moment by figuring out the causes of this problem, we have solved it partially.There are two steps to be taken to resolve the Kashmir dispute, which means to solve the above two problems. So the two steps of remedies are;

1. Revival of that freedom passion in Kashmiri people which was in them at the inception of the popular uprising.

2. succeeding to get the sincere interference of international community especially the major players like United States and United Kingdom.


The second step is spontaneous to the first one.

1. REVIAVAL OF FREEDOM PASSION IN THE PEOPLE; I strongly confront to this notion that Kashmir’s are tired of striving for freedom. It’s only because of the impaired leadership machinery. Even being without a monopolistic leader, Kashmir’s still continue to strive for their goal to a great extent. They still boycott august 15, India s Independence Day, October 27th, when Indian troops entered Kashmir, all elections under Indian constitutions and many more. Although Kashmiri leaders do proclaim a strike call on these days but the reality is that the people do it for themselves and not for the call given by these leaders. But we can not deny the fact that a sincere leader is indispensable for this goal to be accomplished. So my point over here is the need of a passionate, sincere, knowledgeable leader, who has a full public backing. Revolution has always been brought up by single persons, so we have to wait for such a person for whose tones people will dance to. Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah had enjoyed such a support just few decades ago but he failed at the end and ditched his own people. Now we need one more sheikh, provided he does not ditch the people. I am emphasizing the element of the public support enjoyed by him.

Mathematically, we need sheikh Abdullah - treachery.

Such a person even has the ability to mesmerize the people with his demogoguery.He can bring all the people from all shades under one roof and set a common goal for them. Kashmir’s should not abstain to such a situation saying it can lead to more violence, but they should comprehend this fact that everyday people die and nobody cares, it has become a norm of the life now. So is it not better to face it at once by facing the Indian pressure and coming out on the roads irrespective of age, sex, educational backgrounds etc etc ? Exactly the situation of 1989 is to be rejuvenated, but without the gun. gun can be detrimental to the struggle this time, it can give room to India for calling itself terror victim and earn sympathy. So the war is to be waged with power and passion, as was done before but including intelligence and unity this time. The whole world is to be shambled with such local protests. Educated youths are to be involved in this and they be given chances to enter the revolutionary machinery, so that they can go front and speak up in front of the world effectively. It is to be highlighted at the intellectual level. It should become a fashion. People should know what their actual rights are. And all this can be done by that leader who can get the masses behind him.

India has always been strategic in curbing the voice of Kashmir by enforced disappearances, rapes, plunder,custodial killings, imposition of various draconian laws like POTA (prevention of terrorist activities act),AFSPA(armed forces special powers act), artificial ghosts in early 90's to terrorize people and now their latest trend is to indoctrinate Kashmir’s new generation. This year India conducted Gandhi jayanti on a high level in Kashmir asking students to participate in it and even chief minister Ghulam nabi azad asked people to follow Gandhi's principles in this life and keep Islam for the hereafter, and recently on an eve of children's day, children were asked to recite the much debated and controversial Indian patriotic song VANDE MATARAM, which is not only against the kashmiri sentiments but even against Islamic sentiments. This is a religious interference. This is the most dangerous Indian strategy, which could be detrimental to the cause of Kashmir to a great extent, if not dealt with properly. People, especially children should be made aware of these deep conspiracies hatched by New Delhi.




2. SUCCEEDING TO GET THE SINCERE INTERFERENCE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND EVEN THE UNITED NATIONS; as I said earlier, this step is spontaneous to the first one. When such a scenario comes into the being, there is no other way out for the world community to force India for solving the problem.International community never takes cognizance of any dispute unless it is not serious and a threat to the world or regional security. Kashmir dispute has already caused 3 wars between Pakistan and India and now both of these arch rivals have nuclear power, so the next war between them is a threat to the whole of South Asia and the world peace. So this threat is to be practically realized by the world. Pakistan has been pressurizing the world even on this point but as I said earlier that now it is not being considered true Kashmir representative. Islamic world should be insisted to play a role in it. Organization of Islamic countries (OIC) conducts Islamic conference every year and every time expresses its solidarity with the Kashmir cause, but just verbal support does not suffice. All Islamic countries should stop all kinds of trade and relation with India and pressurize it to solve Kashmir. I am emphasizing Islamic countries, because we all know that Kashmir is a Muslim majority place so getting such kind of support is pragmatically comparatively very easy. After getting the Islamic support, Kashmir should turn towards the west. It should organize programmes in which English speaking youth be nurtured and made knowledgeable about the issue and sent to the universities of the United states, united kingdom, Australia and even to the strong Indian allies like Russia. This program should be launched at the high level with huge funds and responsible, knowledgeable people to take care of it. So in this way, Kashmir can build up its young intellectual army against India with non violence and India will be bound not to do anything with it.

CONCLUSION; India is a big country with an obdurate stand on Kashmir, so kashmiris should follow the above furnished two point theory of reviving their freedom passion and getting international support, with patience and perseverance.i am sure it is not difficult to do, but it needs joint efforts. Although Kashmir’s are making efforts but not in the right direction, all efforts by them should make one confluence and form an effort pool. I am certain this is the only best solution for it, which is really productive and does not ask for lot of blood shed.


Contact: www.kashmiryouthintellect.webs.com


The essay competition titled ‘How could Kashmir, the oldest unresolved dispute, be settled’ was  judged independently by Brian Cox, Senior Vice President, ICRD (International Centre for Religion and Diplomacy) in the United States who evaluated the essays and his decision was final.The winner was Mahboob-ul-Haq Makhdoomi of Indiana University, Pennsylvania, while Himanshu Goenka of London School of Oriential and African Studies and Tawseef Kashoo of University of Kashmir, Srinanagar were adjudged the second best.

Tuesday, 26 April 2011

India betrayed Kashmir


By : Mehboob Makhdoomi

Without wasting time in the embellishment of this article, I would prefer to come on to the point, directly. Kashmir imbroglio may be hard to resolve, because of India's adamance, but it's not hard to ascertain the culprit among the parties involved. In this piece of writing, I have no intention to go through the events from 1947 to 2011, in order to prove my interpretations right. In fact, I would like to present some facts which will leave no room for interpretations. Let's see what was promised to us (Kashmiris), not by the United Nations, not by the International community, not by Pakistan but by the very Greats of the Nation of India.


Ponder over these historical statements and you will be astonished at India's arrogance towards Kashmir in 2011.

1) “People seem to forget that Kashmir is not a commodity for sale or to be bartered. It has an individual existence and its people must be the final arbiters of their future.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Report to the All-India Congress Committee, 6 July 1951; The Statesman, New Delhi, 9 July 1951).

2) “We had given our pledge to the people of Kashmir, and subsequently to the United Nations; we stood by it and we stand by it today. Let the people of Kashmir decide.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Statement in the Indian Parliament, 12 February 1951).

3) “We have taken the issue to the United Nations and given our word of honour for a peaceful solution. As a great nation, we cannot go back on it. We have left the question for final solution to the people of Kashmir and we are determined to abide by their decision.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Amrita Bazar Patrika, Calcutta, 2 January 1952).


4) “If, after a proper plebiscite, the people of Kashmir said, 'We do not want to be with India', we are committed to accept that. We will accept it though it might pain us. We will not send any army against them. We will accept that, however hurt we might feel about it, we will change the Constitution, if necessary.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Statement in the Indian Parliament, 26 June 1952).

5) “I want to stress that it is only the people of Kashmir who can decide the future of Kashmir. It is not that we have merely said that to the United Nations and to the people of Kashmir; it is our conviction and one that is borne out by the policy that we have pursued, not only in Kashmir but everywhere. Though these five years have meant a lot of trouble and expense and in spite of all we have done we would willingly leave Kashmir if it was made clear to us that the people of Kashmir wanted us to go. However sad we may feel about leaving. We are not going to stay against the wishes of the people. We are not going to stay against the wishes of the people. We are not going to impose ourselves on them at the point of the bayonet"

I started with the presumption that it is for the people of Kashmir to decide their own future. We will not compel them. In that sense, the people of Kashmir are sovereign”.

(Statement in Indian Parliament, 7th August, 1952)


6) “The whole dispute about Kashmir is still before the United Nations. We cannot just decide things concerning Kashmir. We cannot pass a bill or issue an order concerning Kashmir or do whatever we want.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(The Statesman, 1 May 1953)


7) “Leave the decision regarding the future of this State to the people of the State is not merely a promise to your Government but also to the people of Kashmir and to the world.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(In telegram No. 25 dated 31 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).

8) “In regard to accession also it has been made clear that this is subject to reference to people of State and their decision.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(In telegram No.413 dated 28 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).

9) “We have always right from the beginning accepted the idea of the Kashmir people deciding their fate by referendum or plebiscite………..”

Ultimately, the final decision of settlement, which must come, has first of all to be made basically by the people of Kashmir…….”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Statement at Press Conference in London, 16 January 1951, The Statesman, 18 January 1951).

10) “But so far as the Government of India are concerned, every assurance and international commitment in regard to Kashmir stands.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Statement in the Indian Council of States; 18 May 1954).

11) “The issue in Kashmir is whether violence and naked force should decide the future or the will of the people.

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
(Statement in Indian Constituent Assembly; 25 November 1947).

12) “Kashmir should decide question of accession by plebiscite or referendum under international auspices such as those of the United Nations.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
( Letter No. 368-Primin dated 21 November 1947 to Prime Minister of Pakistan).

13) “…….the people of Kashmir would decide the question of accession. It is open to them to accede to either Dominion then.”

JAWAHARLAL NEHRU
( In telegram No.255 dated 31 October 1947 addressed to Prime Minister of Pakistan).

14) “First of all, I would like to remind you of the fateful days of 1947 when I came to Srinagar and gave the solemn assurance that the people of India would stand by Kashmir in her struggle. On that assurance, I shook Sheikh Abdullah's hand before the vast multitude that had gathered there. I want to repeat that the Government of India will stand by that pledge, whatever happens. That pledge itself stated that it is for the people of Kashmir to decide their fate without external interference. That assurance also remains and will continue”.

(Address at public meeting in Srinagar, 4th June, 1951)

15) “India is a great country and Kashmir is almost in the heart of Asia. There is an enormous difference not only geographically but in all kinds of facts there. Do you think (in dealing with Kashmir) you are dealing with a part of U.P or Bihar or Gujarat?

(Statement in Indian Parliament, 26th June, 1952)


16) “As a result of the plebiscite over the entire state, we would be in a position to consider the matter, so that the final decision should cause the least disturbance and should take into consideration geographical, economic and other important factors.

“I should like to make it clear that there is no intention on my part to exclude the UN from this question of Kashmir.

(Letter to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 3rd September, 1953

17) “Our object is to give freedom to the people of Kashmir to decide their future in a peaceful way so as to create no upset, as we said in our joint statement”.

(Letter to Prime Minister of Pakistan, 10th November, 1953)

18) “India will stand by her international commitments on the Kashmir issue and implement them at the appropriate time."

“The repudiation of international commitments would lower India's prestige abroad”.

(Statement reported in The Time of India, 16th May, 1954)

19) “Kashmir is not a thing to be bandied about between India and Pakistan but it has a soul of its own and an individuality of its own. Nothing can be done without the goodwill and consent of the people of Kashmir”.

(Statement in Indian Parliament, 31st March, 1955)


"Until now, you were reading comments of the very first Prime Minister of India. Now, let us analyze what did The Father of their Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, had to say about Kashmir, even though he did not get much time to address this issue. Let us read the statement of the person whose photo can be viewed on the Indian currency notes, which seems to be the only value given to him by his people"

20.“If the people of Kashmir are in favour of opting for Pakistan, no power on earth can stop them from doing so. They should be left free to decide for themselves”.

(Speech at Prayer Meeting, 26th October, 1947. Complete Works of Mahatma Gandhi)

Not to forget, Governor General of India, Lord Mountbatten, in his letter to Maharaja on 27th October 1947, wrote as follows;

21). “The question of the state's accession should be settled by a reference to the people”.

After these pioneers, let's go ahead and see what other political personalities had to say about us;

22) “The people of Kashmir would be free to decide their future by the recognized democratic method of plebiscite or referendum, which in order to ensure complete impartiality may be held under international auspices.

(Letter from Government of India to UN, 31st December, 1947)

23) “In accepting the accession they [the Government of India] refused to take advantage of the immediate peril in which the State found itself and informed the Ruler that the accession should finally be settled by plebiscite as soon as peace had been restored. They have subsequently made it quite clear that they are agreeable to the plebiscite being conducted if necessary under international auspices."

On the question of accession, the Government of India has always enunciated the policy that in all cases of dispute the people of the State concerned should make the decision."

We have no further interest, and we have agreed that a plebiscite in Kashmir might take place under international auspices after peace and order have been established. “We desire only to see peace restored in Kashmir and ensure that the people of Kashmir are left free to decide in an orderly and peaceful manner the future of their state."

Gopalaswami Ayyangar, (Statement at the Security Council, 15th January, 1948)

24) “The question of accession is to be decided finally in a free plebiscite, on this there is no dispute”.

(White Paper on Kashmir issued by Government of India, 1948)

25) My government has always taken the view that resolutions, if they are passed, must be implemented.”

Krishna Menon, (Statement at UN General Assembly, 5th April, 1951)

26) We adhere strictly to our pledge of plebiscite in Kashmir – a pledge made to the people because they believe in democratic government …… We don't regard Kashmir as a commodity to be trafficked in”.

Krishna Menon
(Press statement in London, reported in the Statesman,

New Delhi, 2nd August, 1951)

27) “The Government of India not only reaffirms its acceptance of the principle that the question of the continuing accession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to India shall be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations, but is anxious that the conditions necessary for such a plebiscite should be created as quickly as possible”.

(Letter from Govt. of India to UN Representative for India and Pakistan, 11th September, 1951)

28)“We do not seek to go behind the UNCIP resolutions, or to ignore the vital elements of principle contained in them. ……We have always adhered to the UNCIP resolutions….. We cannot be a party to the reversal of previous decisions taken by the United Nations Commission with the agreement of the parties.

Mrs. Vijay Lakshmi Pandit,
(Statement at the Security Council, 8th December, 1952)

29) “I want to say for the purpose of the record that there is nothing that has been said on behalf of the Government of India which in the slightest degree indicates that the Government of India or the Union of India will dishonor any international obligations it has undertaken.

Krishna Menon (Statement at UN Security Council, 24th January, 1957)

30)“If, as a result of a plebiscite, the people decided that they did not want to stay with India, then our duty at that time would be to adopt those constitutional procedures which would enable us to separate that territory.”

Krishna Menon, (Statement at UN Security Council, 8th February, 1957)

31) “The resolutions of January 17, 1948 and the resolutions of the UNICP, the assurances given, these are all resolutions which carry a greater weight – that is because we have accepted them, we are parties to them, whether we like them or not.”

Krishna Menon, (Statement at UN Security Council, 20th February, 1957)

32) “These documents (UNCIP reports) and declarations and the resolutions of the Security Council are decisions; they are resolutions, there has been some resolving of a question of one character or another, there has been a meeting of minds on this question where we have committed ourselves to it.

Krishna Menon, (Statement at the Security Council, 9th October, 1957)

33) “India believes that sovereignty rests in the people and should return to them.”

Krishna Menon, (The Statesman, Delhi, 19th January, 1962)

"I reiterate that I won't conclude by trying to feed you with my personal interpretations to beautify my tail piece. In fact, after taking a brief tour of these properly referenced facts,I would like to ask this open-ended question to the people of Kashmir, people of India and the world community that How do you feel when India calls us its integral part and says there is nothing called Kashmir dispute and its final fate was decided with the fake accession of Maharaja in 1947? If I am not wrong, all the above statements have come after India's military occupation in 1947. Does not India stand Naked?"



Mehboob MakhdoomiMehboob Makhdoomi is the President of 'Kashmir Youth Intellect', a global academic group of young Kashmiris, seeking to raise awareness of the Kashmir dispute. His essay 'Resolution of Kashmir' was awarded first prize by the ICRD (International Centre for Religion and Diplomacy) in 2008.

Connect with him on Facebook here http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=697698766

or email him at mehboobmakhdoomi@aol.com


Currently Kashmir Youth Intellect is organizing an essay competition on Kashmir issue. For details, follow this link : http://kashmiryouthintellect.webs.com/essaycontest2011.htm