Monday, 6 June 2011

WikiLeaks: Indian army and Siachen



BY: Yousaf Alamgirian

Amid the WikiLeaks disclosure of the fact that Indian army was engaged in extra judicial killings in Indian held Kashmir the Pak-India talks on Siachen couldn’t achieve success due to Indian army’s resistance. Ironically when Pakistan was interested to reach some point of conciliation the Indian army came in the way of little chance to have peace in the region. It is unfortunate that India’s so-called democratic government is hostage in the hands of its army which is said to be an apolitical. That is how Indian army has shown its apolitical role during the recent talks on Siachen not to sign any of the pact to demilitarize the world’s most frozen and the costly front which has taken many lives of the both sides’ soldiers. Ironically when the talks were undergoing Pakistan’s electronic channels were flashing tickers of Indian air chief that before proceeding further there is a need to have proper line of control there in Siachen. This was, however, a prerogative of Indian democratic government officials to say anything pertaining to the talks. So Indian army’s fresh stance taken on the Siachen issue has supported the WikiLeaks cable of 2006 which stated that every time India and Pakistan came “very close” to an agreement on the Siachen issue, the prime minister of the day would be forced to back out by the Indian defence establishment, the Congress Party hard-line and opposition leaders. In another cable, Ambassador David Mulford citing various obstacles to an agreement on Siachen wrote about the first obstacle “Army Chief JJ Singh appears on the front page of the “Indian Express” seemingly fortnightly to tell readers the Army cannot support a withdrawal from Siachen. Given India’s high degree of civilian control over the armed forces, it is improbable that Gen. Singh could repeatedly make such statements without MoD civilians giving at least tacit approval. Whether or not this is the case, a Siachen deal is improbable while his — and the Army’s — opposition continues to circulate publicly”.WikiLeaks cables depicts that it was nor Pakistan neither its army but it was Indian army not interested to have any peace deal. Indian government which claims of being the biggest democracy of the world doesn’t enjoy the freedom to have its decisions with the consensus of parliament and the political faction but time and again it has to look towards its forces to take permission to go ahead on any of the deal. It reminds of Indian government’s resolve to cut short the number of the troops in held Kashmir but army’s local area commander and obviously the military high command bluntly refused to do the same so Indian government had to retreat from its resolve to decrease the number of troops there. It is heartening to note that due to hardened stance of Indian Army during recently held Defence Secretary level talks between India and Pakistan on the Siachen dispute the issue could not be resolved. During talks which were held in New Delhi, Pakistan delegation suggested immediate disengagement as a forward move for resolving the dispute. The Indian side, however, hardened their stance and did not agree reportedly due to pressure and intransigence of their Army, which was not willing to resolve the Siachen dispute to vacate the conflict zone and go back to previously held position. It depicts vested interest of the Indian army to remain engaged in Kashmir and in Siachen as well. In fact Siachen is bread and butter of Indian army as it includes huge funds and fringe benefits. Many of the fraudulent initiatives have been reported in the past that how Indian army justified its bravery and its stay in the Siachen heights by showering the encounters and its resolve to get the medals. Not only the army deputed in Siachen but in other parts of the country there have been reports of bogus efficiency to claim awards out of the ‘brave’ acts. An Indian Army Colonel H.S. Kohli, has been dismissed and a major suspended for faking killings by splashing tomato ketchup on civilians and passing them off as dead separatists – in the hope of being awarded. Colonel H.S. Kohli, commanding an artillery regiment in Assam, had faked the killing of some separatists last year by making some civilians pose in photographs as enemy casualties after splashing their bodies with tomato sauce. The “daring” colonel in fact tried to use the photographs to back his claim for a gallantry award and was subsequently tried and found guilty in a court martial.The colonel apparently took photographs of some civilians in an isolated place in southern Assam’s Cachar district after pouring tomato sauce on their bodies and making the pictures look like an encounter, with blood splattered over the bodies. The fraud came to light when the colonel’s claims for a gallantry award were processed. It was indeed bizarre to find him claiming a bravery award for the kills, which in fact, did not took place at all.The saucy scandal was not unique of its kind to rock the Indian Army as they had already proved their skills in Siachen scandal in which a Major was accused of inventing enemy killings for the sake of gallantry awards. According to new norms, Indian Army officials are being graded and awarded promotions and bravery awards on the basis of the number of terrorists they capture and kill. So this is how they try to capture the awards and the respect. Why Indian army denies the fact that awards, medals and dignity can only be earned with fervour and can never be achieved with malicious efforts....




Source: Frontier Post

Illegal detentions in Kashmir unheard in Nazi Germany

Senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and eminent Supreme Court lawyer, Ram Jethmalani, Monday hauled up the state government for detaining people without any charge or trial for years, saying the practice was 'unheard of even in Nazi Germany'.

Addressing a press conference here, Jethmalani, who is leading a four-member panel of Kashmir Committee currently on a visit here, said he was “shocked” to know that people in Kashmir were languishing in jails “without any trial or charge for years.”

Referring to incarnated Hurriyat Conference (G) leader, ‘General’ Moosa , Jethmalani said it was “disgraceful” that a man could be detained for 18 years without trial.

“It was shocking to hear from his family that Moosa was being detained for the last 18 years without any trial. I mean this is something we haven’t heard of even in Nazi Germany,”
Jethmalani said.

He said it was distressing that under a democratically elected government, human rights abuses, including arbitrary arrests of “innocent people”, continued unabated .

Jethmalani warned that things could take an ugly turn if the state government continued to “mishandle” the situation.

Chief Minister Omar Abdullah must personally go through the cases of those detained under the Public safety Act (PSA), Jethamalani said.

“This lawlessness must end, innocent people must be freed, only then will the anger of people subside,” he said, “It will also help create an atmosphere for a solution of Kashmir issue.”


He also slammed police officers for summoning “innocents” to police stations without any written orders several times in a week.

Jethmalani also condemned the government crack down on press, saying he was informed that media organizations or persons who do not toe the official line were being “harassed.”

Jethamalani also called for scrapping of AFSPA, terming it as an “evil law which must go.”

He also termed the army’s presence in residential and urban areas as “unnecessary”.

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Pamphlet released by Syed Ali Shah Geelani for tourists and pilgrims

Syed Ali Shah Geelani urged the Kashmiri youth to behave well with the tourists and pilgrims visiting Jammu & Kashmir and to make them aware about the Kashmir dispute, Miseries and Suppression Kashmiris are facing since past 64 year at the hand of Indian occupational forces. He released a pamphlet, written in English, Urdu, Hindi and Kashmiri which is to be distributed among the tourists as a part of awareness campaign. This step of Syed Ali Geelani has been admired and appreciated by the masses.


"WELCOME TO KASHMIR


My dear tourist and pilgrim,


I welcome, welcome you to sylvan and salubrious Kashmir valley. Whatever your faith, whatever language you speak and to whatever region you belong to, we are bound by a common bond, the bond of humanity. You are our honoured guest, respecting and protecting guests is not only our moral obligation but article of faith.


Would you like to know something about your host? Can you spare some minutes to know about the Kashmir dispute? We have full faith; you will spare some minutes to know about this problem that has brought the entire region to the precipice of a nuclear war.


Dear Brother, your hosts are not terrorists or extremists. I and my fellow countrymen are not up in arms against any faith, belief, caste or creed. We nurse no grouse against people of India or for that matter any other country. Live and let live, is the cardinal principle to our philosophy of brotherhood. And on this rationale we want to strengthen our relations with others. You must know that we have been coerced into servitude, same way as British had enslaved people of India.


Dear Brothers, you must know Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of India. It was never a part of India. Till 1947, this country had a distinct position in the comity of nations. On 27th of October 1947, sorties after sorties of Indian army landed on this land and occupied it. And on the strength of share military power it snatched freedom of the people and has perpetuated its occupation till date. The people of this land of great tradition of religious tolerance and humanism are suffering for past sixty three years.


Dear Brother, It is not a fable, an imaginary story; I am just sharing history with you. To this day comity of nations recognizes Kashmir as a dispute. The United Nations Security Council has passed as many as eighteen resolutions guaranteeing right to self determination to the people of Jammu and Kashmir. These resolutions explicitly state providing of an opportunity to the people of the state to decide their future and holding of a plebiscite under the aegis of the United Nations.


My dear Brother, The first Prime Minister of Independent India, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, has pledged to the people of the state in Indian Parliament and at Lal Chowk, Srinagar that they would be given an opportunity to decide their future. His words, “we do not believe in forced marriages. If people of Kashmir don't want to remain with us, we cannot force them and after holding of plebiscite whatever is people's decision, we will happily accept”are a part of proceedings of Indian Parliament.


Dear Brother India betrayed its own pledges and forgot its own commitments. It continues to occupy our land forcibly. For past sixty three years people of Jammu and Kashmir have been struggling against this forcible occupation same way as Gandhi, Subash Chander Bose, Baghat Singh and Sukh Dev fought the British imperialists.


Dear Brother, India claims to be a largest democracy. As a democratic country it should have upheld rights of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. But instead it has been using state power to suppress people of the state and trample down their just and genuine rights under heavy military boots. Since 1947, half a million people have been killed and during past twenty years over a hundred thousand have been done to death, ten thousand have got disappeared in custody, seven thousand women have been dishonored and molested. In North Kashmir 2700 mass graves have been discovered. Fifty thousand children have been orphaned, thirty five thousand women widowed and fifteen hundred women forced to live lives of half-widows. Confinements, detentions without trial under draconian laws like Public Safety Act are order of the day. Thousands have been jailed and subjected to third degree tortures in interogation centers. And as on date 1465 Kashmiris are languishing in different jails within and outside the state. Hair raising agonizing stories inside hundreds of tortures centers across the state melt even the stone hearted but it is yet to prick the conscience of Indian establishment and leadership. I am confident that my woeful story must have touched your heart and stirred your soul. It is my trust, my unflinching belief that from now on you will become my ambassador in people of India and, raise your voice against suppression of about ten million people. And I am equally confident that you will garner support of all justice loving people for my just cause.


Thank You
With Regards
Syed Ali Geelani
Chairman APHC

Mutualism: bedrock of coexistence



Mutualism: bedrock of coexistence

By: Azam Inqilabi


USA, the supremacist power with narcissistic megalomania, is still enthusiastically and assiduously doting on its global hegemonic preponderance and overlordship, notwithstanding its unenviable debt-cum-deficit economy and stiff snubbing resistance of the freedom zealots of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Nasty NATO, the military alliance of the Occidental desperadoes, is literally acting as a recusant hatchet man who perpetually seeks prominence through rowdyism and headhunting. Ruthless and reckless NATO forces are engaged in an aggressive military campaign to decimate and snuff out the daring, darting and chivalrous forces of resistance in Asia and Africa. They still underestimate the invincibility and indefatigability of the highly indoctrinated and self-opinionated freedom votaries of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya. Conscious and conscientious adherents and devotees of freedom and integrity show no signs of laxity, vacillation or swerve. They do not budge; they are determined not to cringe to the intoxicated bourgeois imperialists. Their resilient resistance is, in fact, enviably viable and tenable. So the protagonists of the cause of freedom and self-respect will under no circumstances relinqui
sh the objective of resistance. Obdurate NATO forces— through blitz blockbusters and precision missiles— ideally smashed the mansions and fortifications of these hapless countries into smithereens. They reduced the beautiful hamlets to pulp. Their bombs are now shuffling the rubble in the completely battered and pulverized Afghanistan. And NATO hawks do not feel like shuffling the cards. They relish the ghastly look of this war-ravaged country. NATO, thro
ugh its bulldozing onslaught— carnage, rampage and brash dash, has created an atmosphere of horror and terror in Afghanistan. Thus the state-terrorism is inadvertently grooming swarms of uncompromising ultras wedded to the cause of resistance. Of late, NATO cannibals massacred hundreds of innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Libya; and without remorse and compunction.



In the backdrop of this gruesome scenario of holocaust one really feels aggrieved, agonized and traumatized when hypocrites fetishize the Occidental imperialistic demigods and, through sycophantic applause and encore, add to their inflated arrogance and unilateralism. These brazen-faced toadies and lackeys take pleasure in dancing attendance upon the bourgeois capitalists of the West. They do not feel moved or worried when so-called champions of western democracy (read machiavelliansim) facilitate ruination a
nd devastation of Third World countries through carpet bombing. They play the role of mute spectators when western haughty imperialists clutch and claw the poor “wretched people” of war-torn countries. It is, indeed, deplorable that some of the global toadies, the demons of sadism, want to stereotype the imperialistic, chauvinistic and barbarian role of the co-belligerent forces of onslaught and expansionism.



We express complete solidarity with the suffering but heroic people of Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya where the pastures and roads are paved and stewed with corpses of the innocent people who were busy either in grazing their cattle or purchasing commodities of daily use. We eulogize the iconic ideologues of resistance, viz. Syed Qutub (of Egypt), Maqbool Bhat (of Kashmir), Bhagat Singh (of India), Martin Luther (of America) — the gallant altruists who died for a cause, the cause c�lèbre— right to self-determination and justice. It is imperative for Muslim Ummah to revive and resuscitate its position of prestige and honour through comprehensive dawah and resistance; and it can through sustained purgatory and edifying efforts of transfiguration attain the position of prominence reminiscent of and analogous to its glorious past. It is time to assert not to skulk, funk or flit in the present situation so challenging and exacting. The lurking disdainful propensity for skedaddle, which is tantamount to escapism and defeatism, cannot be brooked and condoned. So heroic deterrence is the most sought-after modus operandi which will eventually and inevitably elevate you to the pinnacle of honour and prestige that suits the ideological Ummah. You can soar high only through self-assertion. This is what pragmatistic pacifism and humanism demands of you.



Kashmiris will continue to grumble against the peremptory and authoritarian rule of India in Kashmir. Your stratocracy in Kashmir muzzles, muffles, stifles and gags every voice of peaceful and democratic dissent here. You have to fulfil your Kashmir-related pledge and promise bequeathed by Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, the icon of Indian freedom movement. And we will continue to emphasize our inalienable right to self-determination come what may. The track record of human rights abuse and violations is a blemish on your much trumpeted “democracy”. Assassins of advocate Jaleel Andrabi, Nelofar and Asiya of Shopian are still at large insinuating guaranteed immunity and impunity. You failed in bringing the culprits to book. Your dereliction and dilatory desultoriness on human rights front portends, foreshadows and presages something ominous— perhaps a volcanic eruption here which will have a domino effect on your internal order there. Your Chanakiyan policy to disparage and scandalize the resistance movement of Kashmir and impute and ascribe everything obnoxious and detestable to its proponent and benefactor, Pakistan, is now redundant and outdated. Our resistance movement is irrefragably indigenous and endogenous. Well, Kashmiris do ingratiate with Pakistan which is magnanimous in extending exogenous moral and diplomatic support to our resistance movement.



Dr. A.Q. Khan, the proud nuclear scientist of Pakistan, recently explained in an article that FIVE nuclear bombs of India and TEN nuclear bombs of Pakistan were sufficient for ensuring the complete annihilation of the Indo-Pak subcontinent. So India and Pakistan, instead of adopting the suicidal course of mutually-assured destruction, should hold back for soul-searching and introspection. Divest yourselves of perennial antagonistic mindset which denudes South Asia of tranquility and peace. Mutualism— the bedrock doctrine of coexistence, amity and entente— should be adopted as an ideal savior and Messiah. This is what your prudent tack, finesse and leadership flair and savoir faire demands of you. So shun and abandon the repugnant and abhorrent course of belligerency and “compulsive hostility”. Stop looking askance at and casting aspersions on each other. Let the chapter of polemics, recrimination, imprecation and shenanigans be consigned to archives for good if durable peace and prosperity of South Asia is the cherished objective of ambitious progressive march to the goal of glory. Your prescient stoicism and prudentialism should necessarily coax and cajole you to knuckle down to brass tacks: peaceful, amicable and honourable settlement of Kashmir issue.


Dichotomic political dualism of Asian nations has again failed and frustrated the humanists. Internal bickering and myopic politics of Asian giants again proved instrumental in emboldening NATO which does not relent in Libya. Humanists felt mortified and petrified when pertinacious, recalcitrant and intractable NATO hawks with dictatorial fixation decided to continue treading the path of intrusion in Libya. Audacious NATO has declared that it would venture on aggressive blitz in Libya to completely batter the towns and cities of that country. Optimism of humanists and pacifists flickered out when Asian nations, instead of asking the western imperialists to atone for and expiate the wrongdoings and redress the grievances of Libyan people through amende honorable, blatantly ducked out and dodged the proponents of peace and added to their disillusionment. And UN Security Council, the corporate body, obsequiously plays the second fiddle thereby creating global power imbalance and rendering the weaker nations vulnerable.

Cousin Of Afzal Guru ‘Condemned’ in KAS interview, Moves To HC

Cousin brother of Parliament attack convict— Afzal Guru, Yasin Satar Guru has moved the Jammu and Kashmir High Court against Public Service Commission for “condemning” him during an interview for Kashmir Administrative Service (KAS).

In the writ petition Yasin Satar Guru, brother of Showkat Ahmad Guru who was sentenced ten-year jail in the parliament attack case, says that he “aggrieved” of the selection process by the PSC while holding that he was condemned.

“The petitioner (Yasin) who secured 1093 marks in the written test examination has been condemned in viva voce by giving him only 30 marks while some other candidates (named private respondents in the petition) who have secured very very (Sic) less marks in written test have been given 190 to 205 in the viva voce,” Yasin says in the writ.

All this has been done, he says, “out of venom because the petitioner belongs to Guru clan two members of which were allegedly involved in the attack on Parliament House."

Yasin (Roll No: 1101283) stood behind only 22 candidates among hundreds who appeared in the Mains. With 1063 marks, he required 65 only to reach the Open Merit cut off – 1128 marks but got paltry 30 marks.

“I was asked question pertaining to surname and thereafter was shown exit gate,” he says while seeking indulgence of the High Court for justice.

Referring to his interview, he says, “The petitioner believed that 250 marks fixed for the interview were divided by the members among themselves and the marks would be given for the interview/viva voce to the candidate by each member as that the only reasonable and fair assessment made by the members of the commission during the interview.”

However, he says, the actual details about the division of marks and the marks awarded to the petitioner by each member can be better stated by the commission to the court to find out as to whether there was fair play in action in the award of marks during the course of interview.

“The petitioner was first asked by the respondent N0.3 (a Member of the Commission) as to what is meaning of the word Guru”.

“It appears that particulars about the identity of the petitioner were available to him and to other members of the commission as otherwise such a question which pertaining to the Surname of the candidate would not normally be asked during an interview for selection of the candidate to the gazette service. The petitioner replied the question saying that “Guru” has its origin from Sanskrit and means “Teacher”.

The second question, he says, followed was whether the petitioner belongs to the same Guru families who have been involved in the Parliament Attack. “This created a very embarrassing scenario in the interview hall and the members of the interview hall and the members of the interview board started whispering with each other giving impression to the petitioner that even before conducting the interview he has been condemned because he belongs to the Guru family of Deobgah.”

During the interview, he says, one of the members put another question. “The petitioner was giving narration of the events pertaining to the question, but the whispering by the other members continued and .......the petitioner was shown exit gate from the interview hall.”

In the petition, Yasin has prayed that court may grant certiorari (seek record) for quashing the appointment of private respondents (13 in number) together, appointed vide government order number 434-GAD of 2011 dated 08-o4-2011.

He has also prayed directions in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to reframe the selection of the best and talented candidates and declaring the interview conducted by the commission as farce.

Lastly, he has prayed that court may grant any other relief which it deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

Friday, 3 June 2011

Dr. Ayyub Thakur- Great Son Of Kashmir

The First Nuclear Scientist And The Freedom Fighter Of Kashmir



Muhammad Ayyub Thakur (1948 – March 10, 2004) was Kashmiri freedom activist, philanthropist,and founder-president of London-based World Kashmir Freedom Movement (WKFM), an organisation dedicated to finding a peaceful political solution to the Kashmir Conflict. He was known for his work to the humanity at the platform of charity organization, Mercy Universal and for coordinating at the international level for the right of self-determination for the people of Jammu and Kashmir.

Dr. Thakur had lectured extensively on Kashmir issue. He attended hundreds of seminars and conferences around the world in universities, think tanks and other institutions, including the universities of Oxford and Cambridge and United Nations bodies. Dr Thakur was a Trustee of the UK-based charity, Mercy Universal, which he had founded in 2000 and was the Director of the Justice Foundation, which he founded in 2003 as a registered UK company to advance the Kashmir cause through public advocacy. Mery Universal provides humanitarian assistance mainly to the war-torn Kashmiri people.


Early life:

Muhammad Ayyub Thakur was born in 1948, in a poor peasent family, in Pudsoo village near Shopian, district Pulwama in Indian administrated Kashmir. He was the eldest of four children


Political activities:

Dr. Ayyub Thakur obtained his Doctorate (Phd.) in Nuclear Physics from the University of Kashmir. In 1978, after a brief stint at the Bhaba Atomic Research Centre (Zakoora, Srinagar) he became lecturer in the Department of Physics in the same university. He had a keen interest in the social and political issues of Jammu and Kashmir. He started his political career in early 1970s as a student leader in the University of Kashmir. He rallied Kashmiri youth and students and founded Jammu and Kashmir Students Islamic Organisation in 1974 and continued to be its patron till 1977. This organisation later merged with another organisation and changed into Islami Jamiat-e-Talaba, which he headed from 1977–1981. He was also the president of Kashmir University Students Union and Kashmir University Research Scholars Association. As a student leader, Dr. Thakur attended international youth and student conferences at Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in 1979, Dhaka, Bangladesh in 1980 and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia in the same year. In these conferences, Dr. Thakur put forward the Kashmiri viewpoint and drew the world attention towards the Kashmir problem. In Kuala Lumpur conference in 1980, he was instrumental in passing a resolution condemning the Indian occupation of Jammu and Kashmir. Dr. Thakur organised meetings of the youth and students to challenge the Kashmir’s accession to India which he considered as fraudulent. He strongly opposed the accord between unionist Kashmiri leader Sheikh Abdullah and Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1974, as being aimed at strengthening Indian occupation of Jammu and Kashmir.


After becoming lecturer at the University of Kashmir he intensified his peaceful political activities. He began organising students and colleagues to form an intellectual response to the Indian occupation. In August 1980, he and many of his colleagues at university and students organisation, Islami Jamiat-i-Talaba, organised an international conference on the issue of right of self-determination of Kashmiris as outlined in the United Nations resolutions on Kashmir. Indian government, however, banned the conference and dismissed Dr. Ayyub from his job as a university teacher, and later imprisoned him along with his colleagues under Public Safety Act (PSA). During his five month imprisonment, he was subjected to inhuman torture of all sorts, but he refused to compromise on his political ideology. After his release in 1981 he bagan to travel far and wide in Kashmir to mobilise the Kashmir youth. But police always tried to intrupts his activities every now and then. Tired of playing a cat-and-mouse game with the police, on May 25, 1981 he opted to accept the offer of a lecturer in the King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah in Saudi Arabia where he served up to 1984.


In exile:

In 1981, Dr. Thakur joined the Nuclear Engineering Department of King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah in Saudi Arabia as Assistant Professor. During his stay, he tried to mobilise support for the Kashmir cause and organised camps for the Kashmiri pilgrims during Hajj. He married the daughter of a respectable man from Baramulla in 1981, in absentia. Probably the first marriage where groom’s consent was taken on phone and the bride flew to Jeddah. After six years of his service, he went to London in 1986 for post-doctoral research programme and simultaneously started organising support for the Kashmir issue. Later in 1990, he took over as the founder president of the World Kashmir Freedom Movement (WKFM). He was also trustee of the UK-based charity, Mercy Universal, which he had founded in 2000 and Director of the Justice Foundation, which he founded in 2003


World Kashmir Freedom Movement:

The World Kashmir Freedom Movement (WKFM) is an umbrella organisation of expatriate Kashmiris from Indian administrated Kashmir working internationally for the promotion of the Kashmir cause. It was set up on 17 June 1990 with Dr. Ayyub Thakur as it president and has offices in Europe, Americas and Middle East. In July 1991, the World Kashmir Freedom Movement organised an international conference on Kashmir issue in Washington, D.C. A large number of US congressmen, members of British Parliament and European Parliament as well as distinguished intellectuals and academicians participated in the conference and supported tri-partite talks for the resolution of Kashmir dispute. During his address to the conference, Dr. Ayyub Thakur, urged Kashmiri militants to renounce the misuse of force no matter how compelling the self-determination aspiration. He was the first Kashmiri leader to offer conditional and issue-based moral support to the Kashmiri militants. The conference was a great success and generated a lot of debate in media and political circles much to the annoyance of India. The Indian Government took the success of the conference very seriously, and accused Dr. Ayyub Thakur of sending money to the Kashmiri freedom fighters for terrorist activities. Under the directions of various Indian intelligence agencies, many cases ranging from terrorism to sabotage were registered against him. The Indian Government booked him under infamous Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA). This case later formed the genesis of the famous Jain Hawala Corruption Case, in which 38 prominent Indian politicians were charge sheeted and later discharged. Dr. Ayyub Thakur also attended the 1991 Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) Foreign minister meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, the 1993 OIC summit meeting in Dakar, Senegal and World tactics did not yield the desired result. On this occasion Dr. Ayyub Thakur led a delegation and highlighted the Indian intransigence and the massive human rights violations. World KKashmir Freedom Movement also joined other Kashmiri groups and attended March 1993 session of United Nations Commission on Human Rights (UNCHR) and later the World Conference on Human Rights at Vienna, Austria in June 1993. As the World Kashmir Freedom Movement activities were growing, Indian Government tried to extradite Ayub Thakur on charges of financing ‘terrorism’ and secessionist plotting. He became India’s chief nemesis. Indian government twice sought his extradition from the UK in 1992 and 1993. After its failure, they finally impounded his passport in 1993. This left Dr. Ayyub stranded in United Kingdom for about four years along with his family. However, in 1997 the British government issued him with a travel document, which he used till his death.


During the visit of British Home Secretary Jack Straw to India in May 2002, Indian Deputy Prime Minister, LK Advani in his meeting with him accused Dr. Thakur of diverting funds to the Kashmiri militants for terrorist activities. He first demanded the arrest of Dr. Thakur under the new anti-terrorist laws and when it did not work, demanded his deportation or extradition to India. The Indian Government tried to build the pressure and made repeated demands for his extradition. Moreover, the Indian intelligence agencies launched a vicious propaganda campaign in the Indian media against Dr. Thakur. Later, in August 2002 when Mr. LK Advani visited UK, he again demanded the extradition of the Dr. Ayyub Thakur. In addition, the Indian High Commission in London reportedly formed a two-member committee to follow the issue on day-to-day basis.


Mercy Universal:

In 2000, World Kashmir Freedom Movement president and its leaders formed, Mercy Universal. Mercy Universal is an International Humanitarian Organisation registered with the Charity Commission in the United Kingdom. It works for the mitigation of peoples suffering in some of the world’s poorest communities in South Asia and East Africa. It also provides humanitarian relief in the UK.


It has so far rehabilitated than 2000 people in Jammu and Kashmir . Among the beneficiaries include hundreds of widows and orphan children whose parents were killed by the Indian army. Mercy Universal carries out its work without being prejudiced by political views of its organisers and helps any body who is a victim and has suffered during the ongoing freedom struggle. However, the Indian Government has accused Mercy Universal of funding terrorist activities and arrested many its volunteers.


Family members harassed:

During the last 15 years all of his family members, relatives and friends were subjected to torture and harassment by the Indian army and its various agencies. His ancestral house in Kashmir was raided many a time and his old parents threatened.


Both his parents died in a hope to see their son, whom they hadn’t seen for more than a decade. His father, Khwaja Ghulam Ahmad Thakur died in November 2001 after a brief illness. He was 75. A year later his 73-year-old mother, Fatima Begum died in December 2002. On both the occasions, Dr. Ayyub could not see his parents or offer their last rites.


His son Muzammil Ayub Thakur is a successful London based Financial Consultant, despite his busy career he attempts to follow the footsteps of his father with the aim and dream of a liberated Kashmir. The Indian government has denied him the right to visit India for good because he has been accused of inciting hatred against Indians, is an extreme right wing Kashmiri nationalist, and has fabricated cases of being subject to physical abuse by the Indian authorities, he promotes himself on television interviews.


Death:

He died at the age of 55, in London on March 10, 2004 after protracting an illness. He was suffering from pulmonary fibrosis His funeral was held at the London Central Mosque, Regent Park, and he was laid to rest at the Garden of Peace, in Greenford, West London, close to where he had been living for many years. The Indian Government refused to allow his remains to be returned to his homeland. He is survived by a widow, a son Muzzammil Ayyub Thakur, who has followed his fathers footsteps, and two daughters.........